Metal parts manufacturing involves various processes, and casting and machining are two of the most common ones used.
Understanding the differences between the two is crucial, as each process has its advantages and disadvantages depending on the project requirements.
Casting tends to be more cost-effective than machining as it eliminates the need for cutting tools and has a higher material utilization rate.
On the other hand, machining offers greater precision and accuracy, which leads to tighter tolerances.
This is extremely useful for creating components in the aerospace, automotive, medical devices, electronics, and consumer goods industries.
In the following sections, we will delve into the key differences between casting and machining and explore factors such as cost, accuracy, material utilization, and industry applications to help you make more informed decisions for your custom metal parts manufacturing project.
By understanding these distinctions, you can choose the method that best aligns with your project requirements and budget considerations.
During the casting process, metals are shaped into functional components by being melted, then poured into a mold in their liquid form, and allowed to solidify.
The resulting solidified part, known as the casting, is then removed from the mold to complete the process.
Casting is used across many industries to create complex geometries and achieve cost-effective production cycles.
The process itself can utilize various materials. However, metals are the most common choice.
Additionally, casting can use other non-metallic materials, like plastic, foam, and rubber, to shape metal components.
A key advantage of the casting method lies in its ability to create complex geometries.
The liquid metal used during the casting process allows for the creation of both simple and highly intricate designs with relative ease.
This ease of formation makes casting particularly suitable for applications where complex shapes or internal cavities are required.
Casting also boasts relatively fast production cycles.
Once the casting tools are properly chosen and prepared, the process requires minimal maintenance and downtime.
This efficiency contributes to both cost savings and the timely production of cast parts.
Casting is also an affordable option for low-volume runs, but even more so for large quantities of large components.
In short, businesses that choose to take advantage of what casting has to offer will be able to efficiently and cost-effectively create dependable and long-lasting custom metal parts and components.
Machining involves the removal of large pieces of material (typically metal) to create small precise parts with a specific shape, size, and surface finish.
This particular process is often referred to as subtractive manufacturing since it involves removing material rather than adding it.
Machining utilizes a variety of equipment to make precise cuts into metal workpieces and form them into specific shapes and sizes.
These include lathes, mills, drill presses, and grinding tools.
Machining has many applications, especially CNC machining, spanning a wide range of industries.
The method is commonly used to produce functional components within the automotive, aerospace, construction, agriculture, telecommunications, sports, medical, and robotics industries.
The most common products and parts produced through this process include:
Perhaps the greatest benefit this process offers is its ability to produce parts with exceptional precision and tight tolerances.
As a result, engineers can create components with exceptional degrees of accuracy and consistency.
The process also offers the advantage of achieving a high-quality surface finish, which is crucial in applications where aesthetics and functionality are important.
Yet another major benefit of this manufacturing method is its material versatility.
It is not limited to metals alone and it can be used with other materials including wood, plastic, composites, and ceramics.
This versatility allows manufacturers to choose the most appropriate materials for different project requirements.
Finally, machining can offer a wider range of geometry features than other manufacturing methods.
Examples of such geometrical patterns include screw threads, straight edges, accurate round holes, and complex contours.
Because of all this, machining is often the preferred method for manufacturers.
Since casting and machining are two distinct manufacturing processes, each has its own unique set of manufacturing characteristics.
Understanding the differences between these methods is crucial for selecting the most suitable approach for your specific project.
While both processes share some similarities, they also differ from one another, especially in the areas of material use, geometric features, shape complexity and accuracy, quality, lead times, and costs.
Each of these key disparities between the two processes is explained in further detail below.
As casting uses liquid material to pour into the mold, metals that can be readily melted down are typically used.
These include:
However, there are other materials that can also be liquified with relative ease, which can be used during the process, too. These include epoxy, concrete, plaster, and clay.
In contrast, machining utilizes more heavy equipment and cutting tools like lathes, mills, and drill presses to cut down material.
As far as materials go, machining utilizes many kinds of metals (such as aluminum, brass, copper, steel, and titanium), as well as plastics and other composites for creating custom parts.
When it comes to features and shape, casting is one of the best manufacturing methods.
Casting excels at producing complex shapes that would be difficult or uneconomical to create through other means, including machining.
The process’s ability to produce complex shapes is due to the fact that the original pattern of the metal is withdrawn by melting it, which allows for almost any complex shape to be cast with deep features.
Casting is particularly good at creating components with internal cavities and intricate designs.
Some examples of cast parts that exhibit intricate designs include engine blocks, turbine blades, and impellers.
This method can also be used to create intricate designs for jewelry and other decorative items.
Machining is also capable of crafting parts with unique geometries.
Through the use of specialized tooling and advanced programming techniques, CNC machining can produce metal parts that exhibit complex geometries.
Some examples of the shapes and geometrical features that machining often produces include internal threads, undercuts, and complex curves.
Creating accurate metal parts during manufacturing is extremely important for several reasons.
First, it ensures that the parts are made to the exact design specifications and that they will function properly.
Second, it helps to prevent defects and reduces waste. Third, it helps to maintain on-time production and achieve budget goals.
In regards to part accuracy, casting tends to be less accurate than machining due to challenges in controlling the cooling rate of the molten metal, which often leads to shrinkage and warping.
Machining, on the other hand, is more precise in its output, largely due to the cutting tools it employs.
As a result, it helps produce parts with tight tolerances and high degrees of accurate cuts.
While part accuracy goes a long way in achieving a high-quality finished product, the overall quality of manufactured metal components can be affected by several other factors.
These include:
Both casting and machining can produce higher-quality metal components, depending on the specific applications and requirements of the components.
However, machining generally produces a better surface finish than casting, as the removal of metal to create the desired shape results in smoother finishes.
Faster lead times allow manufacturers to produce goods more rapidly and effectively compete in their market.
When comparing the differences in lead times between casting and machining, the former offers faster production rates, primarily because it involves fewer manufacturing steps.
There are five core steps in the casting process, while there are at least six main steps in machining.
Reducing lead times are not the only factor in increasing profits either. The ability to reduce manufacturing costs goes a long way in boosting the bottom line.
Aside from increasing profits, reduced manufacturing costs can also help businesses remain competitive as they can lower their prices, thus attracting new customers and increasing sales.
In terms of cost, casting is generally less expensive than machining, especially for high-volume production, as it does not require the expensive cutting tools that machining requires to shape and form metal components.
Out of the many casting processes, die casting is the least expensive in its overall cost, with investment casting and sand casting coming in second and third, respectively.
In trying to determine the most suitable process for any metal parts manufacturing project, factors such as the required shape complexity, tolerances, accuracy, lead times, and budget constraints must be considered.
The differences between casting and machining when it comes to these factors have just been laid out to give you a general idea of which of the two might better suit your particular project requirements.
Just knowing the different features and characteristics of casting and machining is not quite enough to make an accurate decision as to which one is best for your specific needs.
To do that, further scenarios must be calculated to come to a reasonable conclusion.
We shall now discuss six hypothetical scenarios to supply you with a better understanding of which method would likely work best in each one.
The design process of manufacturing involves four main phases:
Since prototyping is when the actual manufacturing method is chosen and put into use, this would be the point where making the initial decision between the two methods (casting and machining) is established.
During the prototyping phase, it is common for design changes to occur.
During this stage, machining is certainly a better choice as it is more flexible and adaptable to design modifications.
Unlike casting, which requires the production of expensive molds that must be adjusted or replaced to accommodate design changes, machining allows for more rapid adjustments.
For example, if it is seen that a matte finish is required, the machining process can be modified by using a different cutting tool or by changing the cutting parameters, such as the feed rate or spindle speed.
However, as the design process progresses toward its final stages, casting may become a more viable option.
Once the design is stable and there are no further anticipated changes, investing in the production of molds for casting can offer benefits in terms of cost-effectiveness and scalability.
Casting can provide more efficient production of complex shapes and high-volume manufacturing.
Machining offers a wider selection of materials compared to casting.
For example, CNC machines can work with all sorts of materials, including many types of metals like aluminum, brass, and steel, as well as plastics such as Acetal (POM), Acrylics (PMMA), Polycarbonate (PC), and Polypropylene (PP).
Machining can also handle materials like stone, ceramic, polymer concrete, porous materials, reinforced composites, carbon alloys, and more.
Casting, on the other hand, has its advantages when it comes to material waste or the lack thereof.
It is a near-net-shape process, meaning that it produces parts that are very close to their final shape and size.
As a result of this near-net shape production, there is a minimal amount of material that needs to be machined away, which significantly reduces the amount of wasted material.
This efficient utilization of material not only contributes to cost savings but also helps improve sustainability goals.
By reducing the need for excess machining and minimizing waste, casting offers cost-effective solutions for manufacturing large or complex metal parts.
It also simplifies the manufacturing process by reducing the number of required parts and assembly operations needed to create the final product.
For designs that involve intricate and complex shapes, casting is ideal. It allows for the creation of complex geometries that would be difficult or expensive to achieve using machining.
Machining cannot produce sharp internal corners or sharp edges, while casting can.
Also, since the material is liquified before it is poured into the mold during casting, almost any geometrical pattern can be formed out of it.
This is not to say, however, that machining can not produce certain part geometries.
The method can effectively create geometry features such as screw threads, precise round holes, and very straight edges.
If a design demands intricate and complex shapes, casting can offer a cost-effective solution, but if certain parts require specific features, like screw threads or highly accurate round holes, machining is probably the better choice.
Casting is an excellent choice when large quantities of identical parts need to be produced with consistent quality.
The casting process allows for the creation of molds made from durable materials like steel, which are custom-designed for each project.
This customization ensures that every component is manufactured to precise specifications, resulting in repeatable parts that are virtually identical.
The machining process can also produce repeatable parts effectively, but not as efficiently as casting when it comes to large production runs.
Machining processes, such as CNC milling, can achieve extremely high accuracy and hold tighter tolerances than most other manufacturing methods.
Its ability to maintain tight tolerances allows for greater control over the dimensions and features of each part, making it well-suited for applications that require superior accuracy and repeatability.
For projects that are focused on large quantities of identical parts, casting provides a more cost-effective solution with consistent quality. However, if a project demands exceptionally tight tolerances and precise repeatability, then machining may be a better option.
Casting is faster than machining when it comes to producing high volumes of parts.
When the mold is prepared in advance, it can reduce the solidification time of the liquid material, thus reducing the overall processing time as a whole.
Once the mold is ready, each cast part can be produced rapidly and at a relatively low incremental cost.
That is a great benefit for projects that require large quantities of parts within a shorter time frame.
Machining, however, is faster at producing low volumes of parts than casting. This is because machining doesn’t require the production of molds to shape metal components.
The machining process removes material from a larger block or billet to shape the final part.
Since machining eliminates the time-consuming step of mold preparation, it tends to be faster at producing metal components—but only at lower volumes and for simpler parts.
Larger projects that require complex geometries could take weeks to finish through the use of this method.
In summary, casting excels in high-volume production runs, while machining offers faster production cycles for lower-volume projects.
When there is a high demand for large quantities of parts, casting is usually preferred over machining because it can produce parts in bulk more efficiently.
Cast molding is great for large quantity runs and maintaining consistency from lot to lot.
The process’s utilization of molds allows for faster and more efficient production processes, resulting in better lead times and increased productivity.
On the other hand, if parts need to be produced on demand with a fluctuating demand pattern, then machining is the recommended approach.
Machining offers flexibility and agility in responding to changing demand and therefore is suitable for small production runs.
The main reason behind machining’s quick production of small quantities of parts is that it does not need to use molds to form designs, so there is no need for any upfront mold preparation.
Additionally, machining can create multiple variations from a single design, accommodating customization requirements and facilitating agile production in response to shifting demands.
Therefore, for large, high-demand production quantities, it is probably best to go with casting, and for smaller, on-demand manufacturing projects to choose machining.
Throughout this guide, we’ve explored the fundamental differences between casting and machining, as well as covered several scenarios to consider when deciding between the two.
After reading the above sections, you should now have a better understanding of how to determine which of the two methods will best meet your metal parts manufacturing goals.
Nevertheless, we still strongly urge you to consult with a custom machine and cast metal parts manufacturing company before you make your final choice.
Through collaboration with professionals who understand the intricacies of both casting and machining, you can better optimize the cost-efficiency, production speed, and overall quality of your metal parts manufacturing projects.
From a contract manufacturing firm, BuntyLLC evolved into a full service custom machined, forged and cast metal parts fabrication enterprise. We supply global solutions from our headquarters in Greenville, South Carolina.
Get A Quote